‘deliberate’ mistake ?

The main chat area for hockey related discussion

Moderator: Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
Bryan
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1467
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:23 pm
Has Liked: 304 times
Been Liked: 183 times

How many of you noticed the rather strange collection of nonsense tonight. No, not the indescribably poor refereeing, but the programme.

A certain player, who amusingingly didn’t even play tonight featured on the front cover. In the picture, his helmet absurdly carried the number 37. Of course that belongs to McAdam. In the team sheet this non-appearing player managed to feature twice. In one item he carried the number 44 (I think he might have initially been given this) but then he featured a second time this carrying the number 73. Is the 37 a transposition? Were Blaze worried that we had listed a roster of 25? Of course this amusing incompetence pales into insignificance compared with tonight’s stripeys, surely the worst ever.
User avatar
Firefox1001
Draft Pick
Draft Pick
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:20 pm
Has Liked: 27 times
Been Liked: 11 times

He wears #37 for the Dogs and was playing for them last night.
Post Reply