Breaking News: Nick Seitz Joins the Flames - Confirmed

GAME THREAD: Steelers v Fife: WED

The main chat area for hockey related discussion

Moderator: Mods

User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3014
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
Has Liked: 46 times
Been Liked: 413 times

Rendo wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:36 pm

A bit of a daft statement really in general as surely all shots are towards goal otherwise it's not really a shot
By me ?
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3014
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
Has Liked: 46 times
Been Liked: 413 times

GOAAALLLLL STEELERS

7-1

And thats the ALL TIME record

Robert Dowd
(Juusola, Watling)
56:27
PPG
User avatar
Rendo
Draft Pick
Draft Pick
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2023 5:42 pm
Has Liked: 101 times
Been Liked: 48 times

mark wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:41 pm
Rendo wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:36 pm

A bit of a daft statement really in general as surely all shots are towards goal otherwise it's not really a shot
By me ?
No, the general statement that people use. Surely all shots are aimed at goal?
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3014
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
Has Liked: 46 times
Been Liked: 413 times

GOAAAALLLLL STEELERS

8-1 Vally Time

Marc-Olivier Vallerand
(Saucerman, Whistle)
59:29
PPG
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3014
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
Has Liked: 46 times
Been Liked: 413 times

Result

Steelers 8-1 Flyers
User avatar
greeny
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 780
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:09 pm
Has Liked: 63 times
Been Liked: 115 times

Game On

As expected an easy victory for steelers. More like a training session which is not suprising considering fife could only muster up 15 players. Just wish the league could be more of an even playing field for all teams and that it could be more competitive throughout all the teams. But it is what it is,,,,,
User avatar
ekt
Draft Pick
Draft Pick
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 11:17 am
Has Liked: 17 times
Been Liked: 28 times

Rendo wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:36 pm
mark wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:31 pm
Bryan wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:16 pm
I thought it was actually 45-11 but I could be wrong
I said shots, not shots on goal.
A bit of a daft statement really in general as surely all shots are towards goal otherwise it's not really a shot
I spent around 4 years doing the goal judge job over at Ice Sheffield for the Juniors when my son played in the Academy, as most hockey parents did, I know its not the same, but the rules are the same.
The definition of a "shot on goal" was one that would have gone in had it not been stopped/deflected/blocked by the netminder.
That is where the netminders stats come from and what they are judged on saves and goals against.
One that goes just wide, over the top, etc. may be a "Shot" in the direction of the goal, but not recorded as a "Shot on goal".

I've not posted on here for a while, are you new to hockey ?
User avatar
Rendo
Draft Pick
Draft Pick
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2023 5:42 pm
Has Liked: 101 times
Been Liked: 48 times

ekt wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 11:15 pm
Rendo wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:36 pm
mark wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:31 pm
Bryan wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:16 pm
I thought it was actually 45-11 but I could be wrong
I said shots, not shots on goal.
A bit of a daft statement really in general as surely all shots are towards goal otherwise it's not really a shot
I spent around 4 years doing the goal judge job over at Ice Sheffield for the Juniors when my son played in the Academy, as most hockey parents did, I know its not the same, but the rules are the same.
The definition of a "shot on goal" was one that would have gone in had it not been stopped/deflected/blocked by the netminder.
That is where the netminders stats come from and what they are judged on saves and goals against.
One that goes just wide, over the top, etc. may be a "Shot" in the direction of the goal, but not recorded as a "Shot on goal".

I've not posted on here for a while, are you new to hockey ?
I've only been following it since around 1996/7 ish.
I get the stat side of it I'm just saying that the saying is daft, a shot on goal or a shot wide of goal are all shots towards goal.
User avatar
Nathan
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 952
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:59 pm
Has Liked: 532 times
Been Liked: 163 times

Rendo wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 11:45 pm
ekt wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 11:15 pm
Rendo wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:36 pm
mark wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:31 pm
Bryan wrote:
Wed Feb 19, 2025 9:16 pm
I thought it was actually 45-11 but I could be wrong
I said shots, not shots on goal.
A bit of a daft statement really in general as surely all shots are towards goal otherwise it's not really a shot
I spent around 4 years doing the goal judge job over at Ice Sheffield for the Juniors when my son played in the Academy, as most hockey parents did, I know its not the same, but the rules are the same.
The definition of a "shot on goal" was one that would have gone in had it not been stopped/deflected/blocked by the netminder.
That is where the netminders stats come from and what they are judged on saves and goals against.
One that goes just wide, over the top, etc. may be a "Shot" in the direction of the goal, but not recorded as a "Shot on goal".

I've not posted on here for a while, are you new to hockey ?
I've only been following it since around 1996/7 ish.
I get the stat side of it I'm just saying that the saying is daft, a shot on goal or a shot wide of goal are all shots towards goal.
Maybe shots on goal then shots on target would be a better description?
User avatar
Doom
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1426
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2020 7:18 am
Has Liked: 95 times
Been Liked: 795 times

I think the tracking on the EIHL website includes for all shots, including those blocked and those wide of goal.

According to that, we had 100 shots overall with 61 on goal.

Fife had 25 shots in total, with 19 on goal.

Dowd had most shots for us with 10.

Top of the +/- for the game were Simpson, Juusola, Diffley and Balmas, all with +3.

It gets much tougher on Saturday.

Regards

Doom
Post Reply