GAME THREAD: Steelers v Flames: CUP: Sat 21st Sep

The main chat area for hockey related discussion

Moderator: Mods

User avatar
greeny
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 882
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:09 pm
Has Liked: 79 times
Been Liked: 131 times

Job done,,,,,
User avatar
Bryan
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1355
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:23 pm
Has Liked: 263 times
Been Liked: 159 times

Disappointed with Guildford. I thought they would be better losers than that. They dragged the whole game down to their level and it frankly became rather tedious towards the end. I thought the stripeys did OK but there is little they can do when a team behaves like that.. Don’t want to see that sort of behaviour again. It insults the paying fans. OK play hard and tough but gratuitous violence is something I thought we had put behind us. Steelers braved it out and stood their ground and showed they can win that way too. Well done the whole team.

I’m afraid that their only goal was gifted by slightly selfish play by Whistle. He tried to go it alone through a crowd and not surprisingly got dispossessed have dragged our front line forward pointlessly and guess what? They scored.

The disputed second goal of theirs was a real oddity. Somehow 8000 people in the stands could see clearly it was goally interference as Greener was barged over. How four stripeys much nearer failed to see it completely defeats me. The only stranger thing is how their coach wanted to argue about it after multiple clear replays on the screen. There were simply no grounds for debate. Perhaps that started a growing false sense of injustice that resulted in the nonsense at the end.
User avatar
Shaun
Draft Pick
Draft Pick
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2020 11:34 pm
Been Liked: 28 times

Not sure why the goal at 40:16 wasn’t given after the Flames took out their own netminder.
Didn’t hear a whistle and the puck clearly went through where the net should have been if it hadn’t knocked off its mooring.
I get why Foxy didn’t challenge as it wouldn’t have been a good look raising a coaches challenge whilst their nm could have been injured.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Brian
Pro Player
Pro Player
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 12:28 pm
Has Liked: 97 times
Been Liked: 144 times

Mmm I saw that Sean. No whistle from the referee before the puck crossed the line and as none of our players were involved it is technically a goal. Almost certainly would have been given against !
E:p E:p
As for their goal, disallowed for goalie interference, isn't goalie interference a minor penalty.?
I suppose it wasn't called because it was part of a review.
User avatar
smbmetal
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 2401
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2020 11:34 am
Been Liked: 666 times

I didn’t see the game, but as a fan of the rough stuff that’s exactly as I’d set up against the Steelers. Not many teams can live with our speed and skill so a bit of old school rough stuff might make us think twice for the next game.

Yet it’s Dowd that gets suspended…..don’t see any of the Guildford players with a DOPs ban. Bit naughty from Dowd when reading the reason for his suspension. Don’t mess with Dowd though Guildford.
User avatar
Jayboy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2521
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 9:43 am
Location: Chesterfield
Has Liked: 77 times
Been Liked: 684 times
Contact:

Most of the Guildford players instigated Dowds reaction.. He was clearly prevoked time after time and in the end he snapped, a perfectly good reaction for me, their guy deserved far more..

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

Image
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3385
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
Has Liked: 48 times
Been Liked: 432 times

Post Reply