The IIHF rulebook is different than the NHL one then.
GAME THREAD: Steelers v Storm: Saturday.
Moderator: Mods
- mark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2825
- Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
- Has Liked: 45 times
- Been Liked: 406 times
Seems that if opposition has control of the puck/scoring opportunity play is not whistled dead, unbelievable that this would allow a shot at an unprotected netminder.

Page 123mark wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 8:40 pmSeems that if opposition has control of the puck/scoring opportunity play is not whistled dead, unbelievable that this would allow a shot at an unprotected netminder.
https://blob.iihf.com/iihf-media/iihfmv ... 191114.pdf
It was an immediate scoring chance for Storm so a good goal according to the rules.
- mark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2825
- Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
- Has Liked: 45 times
- Been Liked: 406 times
Not disputing it was called according the IIHF rulebook, I'm saying that it is a ridiculous and unsafe difference from the NHL rule.smbmetal wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:39 pmPage 123mark wrote: ↑Sat Mar 22, 2025 8:40 pmSeems that if opposition has control of the puck/scoring opportunity play is not whistled dead, unbelievable that this would allow a shot at an unprotected netminder.
https://blob.iihf.com/iihf-media/iihfmv ... 191114.pdf
It was an immediate scoring chance for Storm so a good goal according to the rules.

I did worry that this might be another Coventry, but the team quickly dispelled that.
Job done and we're seriously in this, but I just can't see where Belfast slip up, despite my belief Sheffield and Nottingham are the best two teams.
Regards
Doom
Job done and we're seriously in this, but I just can't see where Belfast slip up, despite my belief Sheffield and Nottingham are the best two teams.
Regards
Doom